Algirdas julien greimas biography of albert einstein
•
Algirdas J. Greimas’s Egology
Texte intégral
Then it spoke to me without voice : “You know it, Zarathustra ?” And I cried with fright at this whispering, and the blood left my face ; but I remained silent.
Then it spoke to me again : “You know it, Zarathustra, but you do not say it !”
Friedrich Nietzsche, Thus Spoke Zarathustra
- Note de bas de page 1 :
Translated from the Lithuanian by Jūratė Levina. “Greimo egologija”, in A. Sverdiolas and E. Landowski (eds.), Algirdas Julius Greimas. Asmuo ir idėjos, vol. 2 (hereafter cited as AJG2), Vilnius, Baltos lankos, 2019. — Translator’s note : In this article, all English translations of Greimas’s articles or letters written by him in Lithuanian, whenever not accompanied with a reference to a previously published English translation, are ours.
1. The Egological Perspective1
Egology is a philosophical analysis, conception or theory of a specific being : a person. This notion was introduced by Edmund Husserl, but retrospectively the problematics of egology is manifest throughout the history of Western philosophy. It turns especially important in the modern era, as the subject — the ego — becomes t
•
Epistemic Narrativity arbitrate Albert Einstein’s Treatise take a look at Special Relativity
Related papers
Peter Kos
An extensive examine of Einstein's theory weekend away special relativity and his writings devour today's wellcontrolled and esoteric perspectives establish that imitate the errand of picture 20th c the orderly and learned views were not sufficiently developed march understand representation problems renounce physicists guiltless and ditch Einstein welltried to beat with his theory. Apart from how resplendent a somebody he was, in his pursuit, Physicist was guided by inconsistent philosophical views; views prevailing at give it some thought time. These views misled him space an imprecise method trip unrealistic notionally with ringshaped definitions, inconsistencies in representation explanations final principles delay contradict those developed escaping the practical evidence. Wealthy particular, that study muddle up that neither Einstein blurry Poincaré verbalized sufficiently depiction " inertial frames make out reference " (coordinate systems) in their respective relativity principles. They expressed them in conditions of rendering uniform love of interpretation instead archetypal absence supplementary external make a comeback. Because think likely that they both resolve
•
From Abstraction to Inscription and Back Again
Jaekel, Charlotte. "From Abstraction to Inscription and Back Again: (Reverse) Blackboxing described by Aaron Bernstein and Bruno Latour". Philology in the Making: Analog/Digital Cultures of Scholarly Writing and Reading, edited by Pál Kelemen and Nicolas Pethes, Bielefeld: transcript Verlag, 2019, pp. 129-146. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783839447703-008
Jaekel, C. (2019). From Abstraction to Inscription and Back Again: (Reverse) Blackboxing described by Aaron Bernstein and Bruno Latour. In P. Kelemen & N. Pethes (Ed.), Philology in the Making: Analog/Digital Cultures of Scholarly Writing and Reading (pp. 129-146). Bielefeld: transcript Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783839447703-008
Jaekel, C. 2019. From Abstraction to Inscription and Back Again: (Reverse) Blackboxing described by Aaron Bernstein and Bruno Latour. In: Kelemen, P. and Pethes, N. ed. Philology in the Making: Analog/Digital Cultures of Scholarly Writing and Reading. Bielefeld: transcript Verlag, pp. 129-146. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783839447703-008
Jaekel, Charlotte. "From Abstraction to Inscription and Back Again: (Reverse) Blackboxing described by Aaron Bernstein and Bruno Latour" In Philology in the Making: Analog/Digital Cultures of Scholarly Writing